Peter Surtees

  • HOME
  • ABOUT ME
  • ARTICLES
  • CONTACT

Purveyors case: voluntary disclosure programme

Friday, 22 April 2022 by Peter Surtees
“ The primary issue in this appeal is whether SARS was correct in rejecting Purveyors’ voluntary disclosure application for non-compliance with s 227, more specifically on the ground that it was not made voluntarily. The issue therefore resolves itself into this: does the exchange or discussions between the representatives of SARS and the officials of
Read more
  • Published in Tax Administration Act
No Comments

SARS wins but bears the costs

Tuesday, 14 May 2019 by Peter Surtees
In its judgment on 6 March 2019 the Pretoria High Court found in favour of SARS in CSARS v Naude & others, case number 51712/2017 (not yet reported) but awarded costs against SARS for disregarding the Uniform Rules and order of the court in the course of the dispute between the applicant and SARS.  As
Read more
  • Published in Tax Administration Act
No Comments

When are circumstances “exceptional”, and when not?

Monday, 28 March 2016 by Peter Surtees
Recent cases argued in the tax court have increasingly focused on the Tax Administration Act, 2011 instead of on the underlying tax merits.  Taxpayers especially and to a lesser extent SARS are learning that the TAA is the essential starting point of dealings in tax matters and not merely a peripheral adjunct to the important
Read more
  • Published in Tax Administration Act
No Comments

Deductibility of damages and the eiusdem generis principle in interpretation

Tuesday, 05 May 2015 by Peter Surtees
In Mr Z v CSARS, case number 13472, heard in the Johannesburg tax court in November 2014 and recently reported, the taxpayer sought, unsuccessfully, to claim a deduction for damages he had paid in settlement of a dispute with a former client. In arriving at its judgment, the court dealt with the application of the
Read more
  • Published in Income Tax, Interpretation of statutes, Tax Administration Act
No Comments

Court rebukes SARS for overly zealous use of preservation provision

Tuesday, 17 March 2015 by Peter Surtees
In a judgment delivered in the High Court of the Western Cape on 9 September 2014, Rogers J rejected SARS’s application for a preservation order and appointment of a curator bonis on the grounds that there was no evidence of a danger that the assets of the taxpayers were likely to be dissipated. The court
Read more
  • Published in Income Tax, Interpretation of statutes, Tax Administration Act
No Comments

Recent Posts

  • Signing wills: comply with the Act

    In Delport v Le Roux and Others[1], the court’s...
  • Assistance to executors: beware the pitfalls

    On 22 March 2022 the Western Cape High Court de...
  • Purveyors case: voluntary disclosure programme

    “ The primary issue in this appeal is whe...
  • Estate duty: disposal in the course of, or during, liquidation?

    On 11 December 2020 the Johannesburg tax court ...
  • The rights of beneficiaries in a trust

    Based on judgments in the law reports, it seems...

Categories

  • Capital gains tax
  • Corporate restructuring rules
  • Deceased estates
  • Donations tax
  • Employment Tax Incentive Act
  • General
  • Income Tax
  • International
  • Interpretation of statutes
  • Non-executive directors
  • Tax Administration Act
  • Trading stock
  • Transfer duty
  • Trusts
  • Uncategorized
  • Value-added tax
  • Wills

Member of

Latest Articles

VIEW ALL
  • Signing wills: comply with the Act

    In Delport v Le Roux and Others[1], the court’s judgment, delivered on 24 November 2022, is a r...

© 2022. All rights reserved. Peter Surtees

TOP