In Delport v Le Roux and Others[1], the court’s judgment, delivered on 24 November 2022, is a r...
Purveyors case: voluntary disclosure programme
Friday, 22 April 2022
“ The primary issue in this appeal is whether SARS was correct in rejecting Purveyors’ voluntary disclosure application for non-compliance with s 227, more specifically on the ground that it was not made voluntarily. The issue therefore resolves itself into this: does the exchange or discussions between the representatives of SARS and the officials of
- Published in Tax Administration Act
No Comments
SARS wins but bears the costs
Tuesday, 14 May 2019
In its judgment on 6 March 2019 the Pretoria High Court found in favour of SARS in CSARS v Naude & others, case number 51712/2017 (not yet reported) but awarded costs against SARS for disregarding the Uniform Rules and order of the court in the course of the dispute between the applicant and SARS. As
- Published in Tax Administration Act
When are circumstances “exceptional”, and when not?
Monday, 28 March 2016
Recent cases argued in the tax court have increasingly focused on the Tax Administration Act, 2011 instead of on the underlying tax merits. Taxpayers especially and to a lesser extent SARS are learning that the TAA is the essential starting point of dealings in tax matters and not merely a peripheral adjunct to the important
- Published in Tax Administration Act
Deductibility of damages and the eiusdem generis principle in interpretation
Tuesday, 05 May 2015
In Mr Z v CSARS, case number 13472, heard in the Johannesburg tax court in November 2014 and recently reported, the taxpayer sought, unsuccessfully, to claim a deduction for damages he had paid in settlement of a dispute with a former client. In arriving at its judgment, the court dealt with the application of the
- Published in Income Tax, Interpretation of statutes, Tax Administration Act
Court rebukes SARS for overly zealous use of preservation provision
Tuesday, 17 March 2015
In a judgment delivered in the High Court of the Western Cape on 9 September 2014, Rogers J rejected SARS’s application for a preservation order and appointment of a curator bonis on the grounds that there was no evidence of a danger that the assets of the taxpayers were likely to be dissipated. The court
- Published in Income Tax, Interpretation of statutes, Tax Administration Act